XF200 and GF700 Gogobest: real deals for electric Moped MTB Bikes

blogs

Meet the fat eMTBs Gogobest GF700 and Bezior XF200

Our readers already know GoGoBest eBikes, because we have been writing about them before. Check out this link for a bit of a story about this Poland-UK-based e-bicycle manufacturer

Now. If you are in search of all-around mountain bikes that also suit perfectly for city rides at crazy low prices, then you shall have a look at the Gogobest GF700 and the Bezior XF200.

They are both rear-motor and fat-wheels moped bikes (or MotoBikes) with limited speed by law at 25Km/h (but they can reach up to 50km/h if unlocked for usage on private ground). Moto Bikes are different from traditional eBikes because they are provided with an accelerator and their motor pushes even if you don't put any force on the pedals.

Both models are classified as electric moped mountain bikes, but they feature quite different characteristics and are designed for different purposes.

The GF700 is a strong adventure short-range eMTB that will lead you into the wild for exploring the surroundings near your place. The XF200 is an MTB-style urban bicycle that is perfect for smashing urban bumpy roads and city roads' obstacles, to get you to work or to your appointment in the center of the town, safely and in a sustainable way. 

Both models are available in multiple colors and all styles are created on an elegant, yet sporty black base.

 

Gogobest GF700: explore your surroundings

The Gogobest GF700 is technically a hardtail MTB, meaning that it features a front suspended fork and the rear is rigid for a better power transfer to the wheel.

With its 37.5 kilograms of weight, this is not really the e-bike you want to bring with you for epic mountain rides in the alps, but it is actually perfect if your trips are mostly in the short and mid-distance range and your budget is relatively low. You will enjoy a lot this bike in the hills and for lake and riverside rides on dirt roads and easy trails. 

The GF700, listed at €1,899.00 is one of the most convenient choices to step into the world of mountain electric bicycles.  

And, fasten your seatbelts... the GF700 is now available for immediate shipping to your door (4 to 6 days as claimed by Gogobest logistics in the UK) at the discounted price of €1,549.99 if you go to this link (save €350,00 + free shipping, if you buy it now from Gogobest website!).

But it is not over: for the readers of the EurekaBike Blog we have an extra 10% discount on top with the following PROMO CODE:

 150off: NAE9YY8

This means that the GF700 could be yours at the stunning price of €1,349.99 only (including free shipping to your door all over the EU)! It is a freaking €550 discount deal. Moreover, you will get:

  • a Xiaomi Mi Band 5 as free GIFT;
  • the opportunity to buy a bundle of: "eBike GOGOBEST GF700 + Bezior Smart Bike Pump + GOGOBEST Rear Rack Luggage Holder" for only €1,528.97 (with the code NAE9YY8 at checkout). 

Bezior XF200 folding urban crossover eMTB

The Bezior XF200 is a different story and it is game-changer for urban and holiday mobility. First of all, this bike is fully suspended and features 20" wheels and, it is foldable.

Yes, you got it right: a foldable, fat, electric, 20", full-suspended moped bike! We have more than 10.000 bikes listed to date on EurekaBike and this is one of the very few of them featuring this interesting layout.

Are you planning to make it yours?  It is easier and more convenient if you do it now.
Just click on this link to jump on their website and put this promo code at the checkout:

150off: NAE9YY8

With that code, you will buy the XF200 at the best possible conditions, resulting in a final price of €1,304.99 only, including free shipping to your door. Moreover, you will get:

  • a Xiaomi Mi Band 5 as free GIFT;
  • the opportunity to buy a bundle of: "eBike BEZIOR XF200 + Bezior E-bike Battery + BEZIOR Rear Rack" for only €1,779.97 (no discount code needed in this case, just add those three to your cart and the offer will activate automatically.

We have a vision about using this bike for hanging around in the woods with a line and a fishing bag on your back... and then on monday using it to get safely to the office. how do you feel about that? 

Jacopo V.

Similar Blogs

News
Giant vs. Pon.Bike: two models for an industry in struggle
While the industry describes itself as being in a downturn, Pon.Bike keeps revenues around €2 billion and remains profitable. Giant drops 15.5% in a year. Behind the numbers lie two diverging industrial philosophies — and an uncomfortable question for the B2B supply chain. The two different contexts of Giant and Pon.Bike  The comparison between Giant Group and Pon.Bike is not a competition, but an analytical tool. The reference data, processed by Elisa Chiu of Anchor Global, shows the revenue curves of the two groups from 2018 to 2025, with Pon data converted from EUR to TWD to make them comparable. The result is clear: the two curves intersect around 2023 and diverge from there. Giant declines. Pon holds. The comparison is not symmetrical, and that is precisely the point. Giant is a pure industrial champion, while Pon.Bike is a capital-driven holding with a portfolio of brands, a subscription-based services component, and a European root in cargo and urban mobility. Comparing them does not mean declaring a winner, but understanding which levers build resilience in a structurally changing market. Key data Giant Revenue 2025: NT$60.25 billion (~€1.7 billion) Giant YoY Change: −15.5% Giant Revenue peak 2022: NT$92.04 billion Decline from 2022 peak to 2025: −34.6% Pon.Bike Revenue 2025: ~€2.0 billion (estimate) Pon structural turning point: Dorel Sports acquisition, 2021 Giant: industrial power, cyclical exposure Giant Group reached its all-time revenue peak in 2022 with NT$92 billion, driven by pandemic demand. From there, the decline was rapid: NT$77 billion in 2023, NT$71 billion in 2024, NT$60 billion in 2025. In three years, the group lost more than 34% of its peak revenue. The reasons are structural. Giant is deeply dependent on the US market through OEM, a channel that amplified post-COVID demand volatility. The business model remains product-centric — development cycles, manufacturing, wholesale — with a limited recurring revenue component capable of smoothing sell-through fluctuations. This is not a weakness per se, and Giant’s manufacturing depth, vertical integration capabilities, and product innovation remain long-term strategic assets. But in the current cycle, that same industrial depth translates into fixed cost rigidity and direct exposure to demand contractions. It is simply the price of the model. Pon.Bike: portfolio, services, opacity Pon.Bike has followed a different trajectory. Their turning point was the acquisition of Dorel Sports in 2021, which brought Cannondale, GT Bicycles, Schwinn, Mongoose and Caloi into the portfolio, transforming Pon into a true global house of brands. The stated goal at the time was a combined revenue of around €2.5 billion. Alongside its brand portfolio, Pon built a Bike Mobility Services component (with Lease a Bike and BusinessBike), generating recurring revenues structurally decoupled from traditional sell-in volatility. Swapfiets further expands its presence in the demand-driven ecosystem, while Urban Arrow strengthens its position in the cargo segment. As Patricia Ibanez Porcel (Bike and Hike Canada) observed: “The real divergence is not just ‘industrial vs portfolio’. It is between product-centric and customer-lifecycle-centric models. Leasing and services reduce volatility because they tie revenue to the customer lifecycle, not to the sales cycle.” The problem is that this resilience is difficult to measure precisely. Pon.Bike operates within Pon Holdings, a private group with significant automotive activities. There are no public segment reports that separate the profitability of the bike business from the rest of the group. As Tommy Sherlock (The Bicycle Depot) points out: “When we say Pon.Bike is profitable, the real question is: profitable on its own — or within a diversified group structure? The question the B2B supply chain should ask The comparison between Giant and Pon.Bike is a signal of where value drivers are concentrating within the industry. The Pon model suggests that resilience is built by diversifying customer touchpoints: not just selling bikes, but supporting a usage lifecycle — leasing, maintenance, subscriptions, data and data-driven services. The brands that will survive future cycles are those capable of monetizing beyond the single physical product transaction. This logic scales down across the supply chain. The advanced dealer is no longer just a point of sale, but becomes a service hub, fleet operator, and subscription manager. What the future of capital geography tells us Giant represents Taiwanese manufacturing excellence. Pon.Bike represents European capital aggregating brands and controlling urban demand. In the medium term, the defining variable will be the e-bike: components, software, data, and direct customer access. Giant has production capabilities. Pon has service touchpoints. The moves made over the next 24 months will say a lot about who will lead the next phase of the industry. Conclusion The divergence between Giant and Pon.Bike is real and structural. The implications for the B2B supply chain are concrete. The next validation point will come from Pon.Bike’s segmented data, when available. But the most relevant question remains another: how replicable is the customer-lifecycle model within the independent supply chain, outside large financial groups? The answer to this question is likely more valuable than the comparison between two major players. Editorial note Missing critical data: no public source precisely separates the contribution of leasing, Urban Arrow, and Swapfiets to Pon.Bike’s total revenue. When Dutch filings become available, this will be the key metric to monitor in order to validate or falsify the structural resilience thesis. Credits and sources Data and chart: Elisa Chiu, Anchor Global (LinkedIn, April 2026) Comments: Tommy Sherlock, Patricia Ibanez Porcel, Jean-Sébastien Fabien, Bernd Hake
05-04-2026 Read Read
News
Presentation of ANCMA data about the Italian bicycle market in 2025
At the ANCMA press conference held on March 31 in Bollate, the main takeaway was the market decline: 1,303,000 bicycles sold in 2025, down -4% compared to 1,354,000 in 2024. Data highlighting a deep structural crisis Looking more closely, traditional bicycles dropped to 1,047,000 units (-3%), while e-bikes declined to 256,000 (-7%). The first key insight is that the segment expected to drive growth – electric – is now the one declining the fastest. Even more significant is the historical comparison: compared to 2019, the market has lost over 400,000 bicycles, despite total revenue rising to approximately €2.5 billion, mainly driven by price increases (up to +32% in 2022). As clearly stated during the conference by Cristiano De Rosa, bicycles are now too expensive, and this represents a direct barrier to market access. The result is a system with lower volumes, higher prices, and reduced accessibility, where the contraction is not sudden but the outcome of a long post-COVID adjustment phase, further exacerbated by an increasingly evident issue of overstock: full warehouses that compress demand, slow product turnover, and disrupt the natural dynamics of the market. The struggle of the specialized retail channel The real breaking point, however, is not the aggregated data, but the evolution of sales channels. Specialized retail, which represents approximately 65–70% of the market, shows the sharpest declines (-14% e-bike and around -8% traditional bikes), while large-scale retail and online channels are growing, partially offsetting the decline of small and mid-sized retailers. This shift is redefining sell-out dynamics: the market is not disappearing, but moving toward more price-driven models and less in-person advisory. Large chains, thanks to competitive pricing and clearer, more structured product information, generate higher trust among consumers. Independent retailers, on the other hand, struggle precisely on clarity and efficiency. Another key point is that the number of physical stores is increasing (over 4,000 in Italy), indicating that retail is not disappearing but evolving, increasingly relying on services (technical assistance and workshops) rather than pure sales. At the same time, bicycle usage is growing (from 2% in 2015 to 4% in 2025), alongside emerging signals such as the expansion of rental (+47% active locations) and the weight of cycling tourism (€10 billion). All indicators of real demand that exists but does not automatically translate into purchases. An industry apparently moving in the opposite direction – but what does it mean? When looking at the industrial side, the picture reverses. In 2025, traditional bicycle production increases to 1,805,000 units (+6%), exports rise to 1,042,000 units (+11%), and imports drop to 284,000 units (-28%). The trade balance (exports minus imports) remains positive at +€172 million, indicating that Italian companies are still capable of transforming mostly Asian components into higher-value finished products. However, this raises critical questions: How long will it take for Chinese brands to enter Western markets with finished products and strong branding? We already discussed this here. To what extent does Italy’s lower labor cost compared to most European countries play a role? In other words, are we truly more competitive, or simply more cost-efficient in assembling mid-range consumer bicycles? The components segment shows even stronger dynamics (exports at €550 million +14.5%, imports at €577 million +25.4%), suggesting an increasing reliance on semi-finished goods for assembly. The Italian bike industry includes 220 companies, 17,000 direct employees, and €1.9 billion in industrial turnover, confirming a seemingly solid and competitive supply chain that positions Italy as a key European manufacturing hub, including contract manufacturing for major international groups. A symbolic data point shared by Piero Nigrelli (ANCMA): 40% of European children ride bicycles made in Italy. The paradox and the urgency to act The paradox is clear: the industry is growing while the domestic market is shrinking. This misalignment is even more evident in the e-bike segment, where Italy remains stuck at around 20% market share (compared to up to 80% in Northern Europe), with declines in production (-17%), exports (-20.7%), and imports (-7.8%). The structural issues are well known: insufficient infrastructure (only €150 million allocated out of €1.2 billion planned for mobility) low perceived safety – to the point that professional athletes like Pogačar have highlighted the risks of cycling in Italy – along with theft concerns lack of coordinated policies and the spread of non-compliant electric vehicles distorting the market insufficient education and cultural development around cycling These macro issues are real, but a crisis of this magnitude requires prioritizing actions that can be implemented within months, not years or decades. The system is not failing due to lack of products, but due to its inability to function efficiently: the connection between production and retail, between usage and purchase, and between supply and end users is breaking down. The real critical point The market is still being analyzed using traditional metrics (sales, production, exports), but the real issue is now different: the ability to convert potential demand into actual demand. This is also where immediate action is possible. It is necessary to make the offering more accessible and understandable through structured product data, support retail in its evolving hybrid role between sales and service, and enable manufacturers and distributors to digitize the supply chain. This would allow retailers to be effectively present online without the current frictions (time, skills, cost), and to intercept demand before the purchase decision. EurekaBike is the missing layer In this context, EurekaBike acts as an enabling infrastructure: a layer that organizes, standardizes, and distributes product data across the entire value chain, improving operational efficiency for brands and distributors, increasing information quality for retailers, and making the purchasing experience simpler and more relevant for the end user. At the same time, it connects supply and demand directly, transforming immobilized stock into sales opportunities and providing retailers with concrete tools to generate demand, both through the consumer marketplace AGORA (live at eurekabike.it) and through new B2B initiatives (HERMES) aimed at connecting distributors and retailers. The -4% of the Italian market should therefore be read as a symptom: the real issue is a misaligned system that, without a pragmatic and immediate intervention, will continue to produce inconsistent results regardless of the strength of the industry.
01-04-2026 Read Read

Filter Blogs

Loading...
go to top
Coming Soon
Stay tuned